Most people misunderstand what Rejection Sensitivity is, what it means and what it is doing. Rejection Sensitivity is commonly described as a strong reaction to rejection, whether you were actually rejected, fear being rejected, or misperceived being rejected. Rejection Sensitivity is commonly called Rejection Sensitive Disorder.
Driven Behaviours: Rejection Sensitivity can drive behaviours that you later regret, but in the moment you feel powerless to stop them (Stress Mountain).
Mistaken Attribution: We can mistakenly attribute the feeling of an adrenaline rise to Rejection Sensitivity, post rationalising (after the experience) that what we felt was because of some rejection, missing that we had an unrelated biological glitch. Rejection Sensitivity is rarely caused by trauma, but it can be due to a history of abusive people.
Cause: Rejection Sensitivity is most commonly a side effect of long term / chronic fatigue or a neurological condition such as Social Anxiety, Eating Disorders, Autism and ADHD. The key aspect is the long term fatigue, and the need to compensate for the actions of Recovery Mode which de-prioritise tasks that are momentarily non-vital. Rejection Sensitivity is the mechanism that re-prioritises certain tasks to be worthy of the expense which can be no longer delayed, pushing those tasks to be socially consequential.
Humans are social animals, where we evolved to be safe in a safe group and we biologically fear being rejected. Rejection Sensitivity can be triggered by the fear that a faulty or absent action from you will trigger another person to reject you, such that even the perception, anticipation or actual corrective (negative) feedback can trigger Crisis Mode, aka the flight / fight response, panic attack, or anxiety attack, or melt down. This can be exacerbated by a history or current experience of abusive people.
Mechanism & Learning: The mechanism behind Rejection Sensitivity is tied in to our normal learning method. Rejection Sensitivity alters the priority of learning to be higher via fight / flight (adrenaline).
Essentially, Recovery Mode is triggered by some kind of unwellness (pain, infection, health condition), and is supposed to be temporary. When you don’t heal quickly, the non-vital (to survival right now) tasks that you have deferred (de-prioritised) start to become vital, so the priority of those tasks needs to be adjusted up to “now”, rather than “later”. Rejection Sensitivity taps into the need for social safety to change the priority of social tasks by catastrophising the consequence of failure, and non-social tasks by creating a social aspect – fear of judgement, missing out etc. Fear on a background of fatigue often triggers Crisis Mode and Survival Mode.
Treating Rejection Sensitivity: To treat Rejection Sensitivity requires both addressing the biological cause of fatigue (medical intervention) and changing the way we manage our mood, boundaries and perception of responsibility (talking therapy) – these should be done in parallel.
- In Brief: Rejection Sensitivity.
- Understanding Rejection Sensitivity
- Managing Rejection Sensitivity
- References
You may also like
- Anxiety
- Other Mental Health
- Neurology
- Nutrition and Diet
- Managing Conflict
In Brief: Rejection Sensitivity.
What Rejection Sensitivity is:
- Rejection Sensitivity is most commonly the unconscious counter to Long Term Fatigue.
- Rejection Sensitivity counteracts Recovery Mode de-prioritisation.
Recovery Mode, Long Term Fatigue, Social Cost & Learning:
- Recovery Mode:
- When we are doing poorly (EG: virus, pain, injury etc), our Recovery Mode is activated:
- Recovery Mode evolved to helps us get back to healthy quickly, via resting, isolation and healing:
- Rest:
- To have space to rest and heal, we decrease what we are doing. That is:
- Doing less allows us to rest,
- We rest by doing less, by de-prioritising ‘non-vital to immediate survival‘ tasks, delaying or cancelling those non-vital tasks.
- To have space to rest and heal, we decrease what we are doing. That is:
- Isolate:
- We isolate to avoid passing on communicable diseases (our body doesn’t know why we are feeling poorly).
- Isolating decreases the perception of external pressures to do tasks.
- Heal:
- When we do enough less, we have space to heal and get over whatever it is that has led to us feeling poorly.
- Eat, sleep, recover.
- Rest:
- Recovery Mode evolved to helps us get back to healthy quickly, via resting, isolation and healing:
- When we are doing poorly (EG: virus, pain, injury etc), our Recovery Mode is activated:
- Long Term Fatigue:
- Long term conditions lead to long term fatigue.
- Recovery Mode is not suited to this, but is continually triggered.
- Delayed ‘non-vital to immediate survival‘ tasks will soon become ‘vital to immediate survival‘,
- The longer these tasks are not done, the worse they get, and the more costly to repair / correct,
- That is, you run out of safety buffer to rest, isolate and heal.
- However, Recovery Mode continues to de-prioritise those ‘now vital tasks‘.
- A mechanism is needed to counteract or override some elements of Recovery Mode.
- Rejection Sensitivity and Social Cost:
- Social Cost is a mechanism that prioritises Social Safety tasks as a matter of Survival:
- Social Cost overrides Recovery Mode:
- Re-prioritise certain tasks,
- Allow the expenditure of very limited resources / energy / spoons to do those tasks.
- So long as the task is reframed in terms of Social Cost aka risk / consequence.
- Social Cost overrides Recovery Mode:
- This use of Social Cost is Rejection Sensitivity.
- Social Cost is a mechanism that prioritises Social Safety tasks as a matter of Survival:
- Learning:
- Humans evolved to learn their way out of predictable, repetitive problems.
- Constantly triggering Rejection Sensitivity to use Social Cost to override Recovery Mode triggers the Learning Mechanism:
- Analyse the Cause: aka why things keep going wrong,
- Our Survival Mechanism Bias means assuming an external cause, missing Long Term Fatigue as the primary cause.
- Create a Solution:
- Except it is probably the wrong problem (thinking it is social or trauma rather than biological), so the wrong solution,
- Fix the Problem: to decrease future Social Costs and wasted Resources,
- If the cause was correct.
- Analyse the Cause: aka why things keep going wrong,
- Constantly triggering Rejection Sensitivity to use Social Cost to override Recovery Mode triggers the Learning Mechanism:
- This leads to erroneously expending energy in Thought and Mood Loops without progress.
- Humans evolved to learn their way out of predictable, repetitive problems.
Treating Rejection Sensitivity:
In parallel:
- Medical:
- Identify, Diagnose and Treat the Biological Factor,
- It is not natural for you to be so fatigued.
- There will be a cause.
- There is no lazy.
- Diagnosing the condition(s).
- Diagnosis via medical professinoals,
- Treatment Plan,
- Medical intervention for the condition(s).
- Therapy:
- Identify possible toxic situations and abusive people:
- Recognising toxic situations and abusive people.
- Managing toxic situations and abusive people.
- Learning not to be a victim to these.
- Recognise and manage escalation of social interactions:
- Self Care:
- Learning reasonable boundaries (objectivity),
- Adjusting one’s own responsibility back to ‘fair’ (people pleasing),
- Relearn how to safely Learn:
- Ending the thought / mood loops.
- Self Care:
- Identify possible toxic situations and abusive people:
Understanding Rejection Sensitivity
For optimal survival, we need to be healthy. Multiple causes can lead to ill health, which compromises our survival. Recovery Mode evolved to help us return to healthy as quickly as possible. Recovery Mode will push us to rest, isolate and heal. Recovery Mode de-prioritises non-vital to immediate survival tasks, allowing us to rest; isolate to not pass on a communicable infection, and heal while resting. Once our temporary conditions heals, Recovery Mode switches off, and we get back to being active (doing tasks) and being social.
Some conditions that compromise our health are not healed quickly, which leads to long term fatigue. Recovery Mode continues to be triggered, which leads to important tasks that were deemed ‘non-vital to immediate recovery‘ becoming vital. Recovery Mode didn’t evolve to note the difference, so continues to de-prioritise those tasks. A mechanism is needed to override Recovery Mode, to shift their priority up to ‘vital‘ so that we will be able to expend some of our limited energy (Spoons) on that task.
Humans are social being. We evolved in a time where being alone was deadly. To be integrated into and welcomed in a group of humans means a significant improvement to survival (and happiness). An important part of being in a group is being valued by the group, so that we are not rejected when things get tough. That is your Social Standing, and any harm to that is a Social Cost.
Rejection Sensitivity taps into this Social Cost (‘fear of being rejected, ejected or neglected‘ by the group) to ‘re-prioritise‘ certain tasks that have now become more vital, to offset the Recovery Mode‘s failed temporary ‘de-prioritisation‘.
Tandem Pathways – Fatigue Adrenaline vs Re-prioritisation Learning:
- Fatigue Adrenaline:
- Perceived Need triggers a strong adrenaline release, empowering action (doing tasks):
- Perceived Need can be triggered a perceived clear and present emergency, or by fatigue not stopping and temporary ceased non-vital tasks have now become vital due to the long term fatigue.
- Adrenaline allows us to continue when we should really be resting, if the cause of fatigue was temporary.
- Adrenaline is often mistakenly interpreted as anxiety or aggression.
- Anxiety is often interpreted as Social Anxiety.
- Perceived Need triggers a strong adrenaline release, empowering action (doing tasks):
- Re-prioritising Learning:
- The need to learn, grow and do better (in the context of fatigue) requires shifting the priority of learning back to a ‘present need / vital‘ rather than ‘future need / non-vital‘ or ‘present want / non-vital‘.
- The mechanism is unconsciously mentally exacerbating the consequences of non-action or faulty-action via faulty logic and heightened feelings (fear of other peoples anger or disgust).
- Fear of other people’s reactions creates a perceived ‘urgent needing our attention‘, that triggers adrenaline (see 1. Fatigue Adrenaline), allowing for action despite Recovery Mode de-prioritisation caused by fatigue.
- The need to learn, grow and do better (in the context of fatigue) requires shifting the priority of learning back to a ‘present need / vital‘ rather than ‘future need / non-vital‘ or ‘present want / non-vital‘.
To treat Rejection Sensitivity requires integrating both biological medical and talking therapy intervention.
People frequently underestimate the importance of figuring out why you are fatigued, often erroneous reaching for a trauma explanation for Rejection Sensitivity. Rejection Sensitivity is rarely due to trauma, however trauma can exacerbate the difficulties you have with Rejection Sensitivity.
Understanding Mood Management:
Imagine that your mood exists on a spectrum between 0 and 10.
- With hard work (high cognitive function and expenditure of energy), we can manually shift our mood between 1 to 2 points on the spectrum, so long as you focus and expend energy.
- If you are fatigued, you don’t have the spare energy to maintain this manual cognitive mood shift for long, if at all.
- If you are often 3 or more steps out of mood alignment to your surroundings (eg high fear instead of low):
- Your mood is probably dysregulated by a biological origin.
- We cover that below under Biology.
Biological problems need biological solutions. That means diagnosis and medication.
Rejection Sensitivity Feels Like…
The Rejection Sensitivity sensation is a flavour of a miss-triggered Survival Response – Freeze, Fawn, Flight or Fight.
Rejection Sensitivity can feel like:
- Physical:
- A tightening or clenching in the guts.
- Sometimes it can feel like we have been punched.
- A tightening of the chest.
- Breathing can feel hard.
- Our heart can beat faster.
- We may mistake this for a heart attack.
- Tingling in the arms.
- Ringing in our head.
- A feeling of nausea and or dizziness.
- A tightening or clenching in the guts.
- Emotional, feelings of:
- Shame
- Guilt
- Fear / Anxiety / Worry
- Anger
- Ruminating on conversations and looking for:
- Signs of danger from others; that is, indications from their body language, choice of words or cadence that they meant something more. We are seeking the early warning signs of rejection and or abandonment.
- Indications that we said something that was either deliberately mean, or would be taken as wrong by the other person.
- Behaviour:
- Analysing conversations.
- Frequently checking with people that they weren’t offended.
- Frequently checking with people that they don’t hate us / still like us.
- Avoiding people.
- People pleasing / conflict avoidance.
- Aggression:
- Picking fights.
- Trying to find fault in others.
- Prematurely ending friendships / relationships before they can abandon or reject you.
Rejection Sensitivity is a Learning Mechanism Compensation
“The best way to get good at something,
is to start off terrible, note your mistakes, make changes and try again.
Keep doing the things that work well,
try variants of the things that don’t.
That is how you learn to do better. “
Joshua Davidson.
In Brief:
From birth to death, we continue to learn things. Learning is what allows us to grow and become greater than we were.
Learning is hard. Learning takes effort – and effort is energy – and sometimes we just don’t have the Spoons to do more.
Many psychiatric conditions, such as Anxiety and Depression, or neurological conditions such as Autism or ADHD, or biological conditions such as cardiopulmonary or autoimmune conditions, frequently have low problems with low energy. This leads to you having a resource problem.
When our resources are poor, because we are exhausted (no spoons), we switch to Recovery Mode. Recovery Mode is a natural process we use when we are ill, such as having a cold, torn muscle or some other biological problem that needs healing. When we need to recover, we do less chosen actions and do more resting & healing.
Learning is essential, so it is important to do. Yet when we are in Recovery Mode, we are driven to de-prioritise non-essential tasks so that we can focus on needs. Not learning a thing right now won’t lead to imminent death or harm, so we are likely to de-prioritise that too. Yet, delay too many times, and our conscious and or unconscious mind will realise that there is a problem here and seek to re-prioritise learning again.
How do we increase the importance of learning beyond the fact that it is essential for our growth and quality of life? We add drama.
Social, Regret & Guilt Drives Re-Prioritisation
Regret is a feeling, a signal your learning centre sends you to highlight that the outcome of your actions isn’t what you wanted.
The purpose of this signal is to irritate you into processing the event to identify what went wrong and what you can do to fix it. We often mistakenly employ the Hindsight Bias, a cognitive error, that blames your past self for not having the knowledge that you have learned now, not having the resources that you have acquired now, or the skills that you have developed now. Have faith that you did the best you could in the circumstances you were in at that time.
Often we are interacting with other people, which can add complexity to your intended actions, increasing the odds of the outcome being other than what you want. We fear losing social status due to a perceived error, whether we made a mistake or someone makes a false claim. Abusive people will hijack this fear to control and abuse us, often falsely claiming that we were malicious, or that our actions were harmful when they weren’t.
Guilt is a feeling, a signal from our social centre, that informs you that your action had an outcome that caused harm to someone.
The purpose of guilt is to push you to regret (as above) and then take action to make amends for your error. It is important to ensure that the claimed harm (whether your fears, the alleged victims claims or a third party’s claim) is fair, reasonable and evidenced harm.
Regret and Guilt are feelings that prompt us to learn better for next time, and if needed, to make amends.
Rejection Sensitivity will often hijack these feelings and ramp them up to drive us to learn.
Learning, Relearning & Rehearsal
As stated, Learning is Essential.
The best tool for Learning is:
- Review the past,
- Understand what went wrong (mistakes),
- Learn a new way to solve the problems,
- Practice and rehearse this new solution.
Once this Learning process is complete, if the problem occurs again, your regrets (and guilt) will prompt you to not want to repeat the past outcome and thus you will want to use the new solution that you have learned, and reinforced by repetition – the practice and rehearsal.
Pre and Post Scripting
Unlike a video game, it is very hard to repeat the same circumstance so that you can properly try and try again. By try and try again, I mean try new variants until you get through the level unscathed, then practice it until it becomes second nature.
How are we to learn without being able to reload form a save point? We enact virtual rehearsals.
Pre-Script
Prior to the event, we use pre-scripts. You’ll recognise this as pretending a conversation that you might have, trying to predict what they might say or do, so that you can try different sentences, explanations and actions, to get to the good place. The more accurately you imagine the other person and their probable responses, the more you can ensure that you can say what you need to say and do what you need to do, so that everything works.
Post Script
After the event, we use post-scripts. You’ll recognise this as going over the minutia of the event, searching for any mistakes you might have made, do over conversations where you get to say that thing you wanted to, or figure out how to re-direct the thing that went wrong through words or actions. So long as these are reasonable and possible words and events, and both the characters in your post-script analysis and real life people at the event are not abusive.
Abusive and Toxic People aren’t Reasonable
Toxic means a situation or person who is not compatible with you. Abusive is someone who benefits from harming you. For simplicity, we are going to just refer to toxic and abusive people.
The difference between toxic / abusive people versus people who make a mistake is in how they accept responsibility for their part in the harm, and thus whether they adjust in the future to decrease and cease harm. We can all make mistakes, but most people work hard to avoid making the same mistake. Abusive people don’t change to avoid harming you, because that was the point.
We cover this in far more detail in Understanding Abusive People.
“People who know better cannot help but do better”, often attributed to Socrates.
“Good people who know better cannot help but do better, concerning people won’t do better even if you help them know what is better – that’s how we tell who is who” – Joshua Davidson
Toxic and abusive people will constantly change the rules so that you cannot win.
In order to learn from an event means that some level of predictable extrapolation can be employed in understanding the event so that certain actions are highly likely to have a predictable outcome. If the people involved keep changing the rules without telling you, not strategy you can come up with to navigate that situation better can be expected to work. They don’t have good or stable reasons why they do what they do, making it very hard for you to come up with a reasonable strategy that will probably work.
We cover this a bit more below in Managing Rejection Sensitivity. It is important for you to be aware that you can develop a form of Rejection Sensitivity from being surrounded by too many harmful people.
Compensating with Drama
At some point, the fatigue has lasted too long and the delayed learning becomes far more important. We unconsciously know this, but the Recovery Mode part of our brain is struggling to figure out when to learn. Another part of us compensates by making shifting the priority of learning higher by dramatising the consequences of failure and judgement.
Rejection Sensitivity is that compensation
– shifting the priority of learning higher,
through drama to compensate,
for long lasting fatigue.
Biology – Threat Detection Errors & Anxiety
Anxiety is a natural condition of attentive preparedness for an anticipated stress / survival moment. Anxiety should be short term. Most people struggling with Rejection Sensitivity are also diagnosed with Anxiety, where Anxiety is a long term symptom. Anxiety is always secondary to some other condition (its more like a symptom in my opinion). We cover that in more detail in Anxiety.
Our brain is trying to predict what to do, whether that is to work out how to defeat a threat / problem, or to heal and prepare.
To do this, it looks at the current perceived situation, made of a combination of sensory input and understood context clues from historical patterns and making assumptions from interpolation (filling in the gaps); then it tries to identify what is going to happen next by applying prior learning to the current perceived pattern and extrapolating (extending the pattern) the next outcome. If you know what is coming next, you might change your actions to shift the outcome to be more favourable. This is true for all consciously awake people.
Interpolation: Filling in the gaps of a pattern.
Extrapolation: Extending the pattern to figure out what is next.
A part of perception is how our Amygdala (part of your midbrain limbic system) assigns risk value to events that you perceive. It does this by looking at the raw feed of your sensory inputs at the cerebellum (hindbrain, just above your spine) and comparing that to information in your thalamus and hypothalamus. When this works well, you can recognise problems and may even have some solutions primed to those problems, or that you are not in danger and therefore safe. If we recognise the genre of problem, our prefrontal cortex (the front 1/3 of your brain, behind your forehead) will receive a feeling of fear, anger or disgust. If it can’t identify the genre, but also can’t confirm that you are safe, you feel a general feeling of unease. This can trigger the feeling of anxiety or aggression. If your Amygdala knows that your current situation doesn’t match a problem, then it will report “safe” and you will feel comfort, at ease and joy is available.
If you detect “safe”, you might use this time to heal, relax, recuperate, prepare for the future, create and so on.
If you detect “unsafe”, your prefrontal cortex, once armed with a feeling of fear, anger, disgust or unease, will try to identify the problem, looking for the threats in the environment. If you detect a threat, you will start to solve for that. If you have no time, then you’re response will focus on the Survival F’s – Freeze, Fawn, Flight and Fight. If you have time, your method for solving the problem can be more creative and nuanced.

For Rejection Sensitivity, your Amygdala continually reports to you that you are “not safe“, but doesn’t specify why. Your prefrontal cortex looks for a clear and present danger, but usually can’t find it. Then it checks for subtle threats, such as signs of a predatory animal, signs of a predatory human, or some other disaster. If you convince yourself that this is not true, then the next likely threat must be societal. That is, ‘what if something is wrong with the people you think you can trust and who you hope love you – and maybe you caused it?’
There are several reasons why your Amygdala can’t confirm that you are safe.
The most common and likely is biological problems, most commonly with the Dopaminergic System. This can be exacerbated by historical conflict and or present conflict. Sometimes, this can be caused by a historical traumatic problem.
We’ll cover those in another section.
Rejection Sensitivity or Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria?
Rejection Sensitivity is an umbrella term that includes both the specific experience of over reacting to actual, perceived or expected rejection; and the rest of the RS family (covered below). It was first described by Downey, Khouri, & Feldman in 1997 as a model to describe how prior rejection plus some physical aspects could lead to an over sensitisation to being rejected, leading to a higher reaction the next time a person perceives rejection.
Dr William Dodson, a psychiatrist, shared a paper “Emotional Regulation and Rejection Sensitivity” in 2017, where he discussed how ADHDers can often have a mood dysregulation especially around feelings to do with rejection. Dodson proposed that RSD, Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria, should be added as a selection criteria to the DSM for ADHD diagnosis, and that this trait had been deliberately not included “because it was not always there, it was often hidden by the person with ADHD, and because there was no way to measure rejection.” Dodson added the “dysphoria” to emphasis the extreme feeling of pain and aversion that this symptoms has over the typical discomfort from being rejected.
To date, RSD has not been added to the DSM 4 or 5, nor the ICD 10 or 11.
Amongst some sectors of mental health, there was push back about this new proposed initialism, as the existing Rejection Sensitivity definition isn’t just referring to a momentary discomfort from being rejected, it is referring to the sensitivity someone may develop to being rejected due to extenuating circumstances and how that may affect you. As an analogy, chronic pain rather than just pain.
Adding on “dysphoria” is like saying chronic pain max (we really mean it!).
Despite this redundancy, RSD has become the de facto standard in online communities.
Social Acceptance and Masking
Masking is a mechanism used by neurodivergent people, such as Autistic and ADHDers, to fit in with others. Masking is not evil. All people do it to some extent – no one is 100% themselves. Part of working with other people is adapting and adjusting, that’s part of civilisation.
Masking becomes a problem when:
- It is used to negate the authentic self (ABA).
- This is beyond the scope of this page.
- You lose track of who you are behind the adjustments.
- This is also beyond the scope of this page.
- Rejection uncertainty.
- Covered below.
Why do we mask?
When we try to make new friends (or positively interact with strangers), we hope the other person is a good person who is worth being friends with. To help them like us, we want to “fit in” with them. What does “fit in” mean?
We are seeking connection with someone else because we need something. Humans are social creatures, we do poorly on our own. At the least we want to spend some time around reasonable people for our own mental health. Sometimes, we want specific help. Navigating the conventions of a different neurotype can be very hard.
The reciprocal aspect of us needing something from them is that we need to provide them something that they want or need. Our own low self worth often suggests that we are not enough in and of ourselves for them to seek us out for just human connection, so surely, our brains tell us, we have to give them something more.
We try to figure out what they want or need, and if we can find that, if we can fulfill that. To decrease the risk of immediate rejection from the group, we may offer gifts, services and work extra hard to compensate for our perception of our own low worth. It is not uncommon for us to put so much work in, that we are doing the work of 2 or more people (consider how many people it would take to replace you at work).
Every group has a set of rules of inclusion and exclusion that defines this group as different to another group. Some of these rules are explicit, written down for social clubs or clearly voiced by someone. Most of the rules are implicit, where you are expected to read between the lines, pick up on the standards by observing people or work it out after you have broken them and received scorn. We are terrified of rejection.
Me mask to fit in.
Rejection Uncertainty
If you are masking heavily, and you are not accepted by a person or the group we want to work out what went wrong.
We are uncertain about the rejection for various reasons.
- Was something was wrong with your mask?
- Did they see you behind the mask, and didn’t like you?
- Did someone else said something about you?
- Was it the Uncanny Valley?
Uncertainty is a huge trigger for anxiety. In not knowing, we often create so many scenarios that are far worse than what actually happened.
The Rejection Sensitivity Family
Rejection Sensitivity is an umbrella term for a host of feelings beyond just Rejection Sensitivity.
- Rejection sensitivity:
- An over strong reaction to perceived or actual rejection.
- Imposter Syndrome:
- A persistent inability to believe that your success is deserved, and or has been legitimately achieved as a result of your efforts or skills and the fear that you will get caught by someone at any minute.
- Fear of Betrayal:
- Fear that people whom you trust and are vulnerable to will betray you sooner or later.
- Fear of Abandonment:
- Fear that people will leave you behind, especially when you need help.
- FOMO (Fear of Missing Out):
- The feeling you have when you think other’s are having fun or an experience, and you are falling behind them.
- Fear of Failure:
- The worry about how people will react when you inevitably make mistakes
- The fear that you are responsible for the consequences these mistakes will have to you or others.
- Fear of Being Alone:
- Fear that you won’t have friends or anyone you can trust.
- Fear that you will never have anyone be kind to you again.
- Fear of Conflict / Conflict Avoidant:
- Fear of conflict that leads to avoiding people, anything that resembles conflict and can trigger People Pleasing Behaviours.
Compensatory Behaviours
To manage each of these, people can form People Pleasing and conflict avoidance behaviours, where you avoid ever pointing out someone else’s mistakes and take on far, far, far too much responsibility. You do this until you collapse in exhaustion and likely experience burnout.
- People Pleasing Behaviours:
- The automatic “yes” you say when asked to do anything, which you often regret later.
- The Faun part of the emergency system, Freeze, Faun, Flight and Fight.
- People Pleasing tries to pre-empt the danger someone may pose to you if they are upset or angry by making them very happy with you at all times.
- PDA (Pathological Demand Avoidance):
- The automatic “no” you say when asked to do anything, which you often regret later.
- Effectively the opposite of People Pleasing.
More on PDA, Pathological Demand Avoidance.
Managing Rejection Sensitivity
Once we know what Rejection Sensitivity is and what it is trying to do, the next big question is: what to do about it?
- Deal with the biology to address fatigue and the fight/flight reflex:
- Diagnosing the condition.
- Medical intervention for the condition.
- Relearn how to safely learn and RS becomes a thing of the past:
- Toxic situations and abusive people:
- Recognising toxic situations and abusive people.
- Managing toxic situations and abusive people.
- Learning not to be a victim to these.
- Recognising biological drivers for escalation over social:
- Learning reasonable boundaries (objectivity),
- Adjusting one’s own responsibility back to ‘fair’,
- Ending the thought / mood loops.
- Toxic situations and abusive people:
Diagnosis and Treatment
Ongoing fatigue does just come from nowhere. There is a reason for it. There is no Lazy.
Fatigue, like Anxiety, is a symptom of some other condition. This could be:
- Neurological:
- Cardiopulmonary:
- Cardiovascular system (heart and blood),
- Respiration system (lungs),
- Immune system:
- Eg: Autoimmune.
- Poor Sleep.
- Malnutrition, can be low:
- Iron (Ferritin serum) ,
- Vitamin B6, B12, C, etc,
- Salts.
- Etc.
- Consequences of a medication to treat another condition.
- And more.
Once you know what the underlying condition is, you need to address that medically.
Medical Intervention
“Biological Problems need Biological Solutions”,
Joshua Davidson.
That often means some kind of medical intervention, the most common of which is medication. Talk to your doctor about trying to determine why you are fatigued and what you can do about it.
Sometimes, a short term medication may be enough.
Generally, a long term or life long medication is needed.
Sometimes an operation is necessary.
If your GP can’t figure out what is causing the fatigue, you may need to see a specialist. Sometimes you need a new GP to try a new series of tests. It can be incredibly frustrating to get to the bottom of why we feel fatigued.
Noradrenaline and Anxiety
Noradrenaline is a neurotransmitter that strongly affects how our Amygdala manages threat detection. Depending on if we detect a threat or determine that we are safe, our priorities and feelings (mood) will adjust. If our Noradrenaline is outside of the Goldilocks Zone (too high or too low), our Amygdala cannot correctly identify when we are safe, so it will continually erroneously report that we are not safe.
When our brain thinks we are not safe, our prefrontal cortex (just behind your forehead) will try to manually work out what the threat is. If there is a problem, it will be clear and present – that is, obvious. When we fail to notice a clear and present danger, as the feeling of unease has persisted, we begin to look for subtle, to explain why we feel unsafe. Subtle means the next most likely contender for a threat – other people.
We covered this in more detail above in the section Threat Detection Errors.
The two most common disruptors of the Amygdala are Dopaminergic problems, such as ADHD (and common in Autism, BPD, OCD and other conditions), and body adrenal complications common in cardiopulmonary conditions.
If your noradrenaline and or adrenaline is too high, you’ll need different medications compared to if your Noradrenaline and adrenaline is too low. There is no specific medical test for this, other than to trial the medication and see how you respond.
There is an unorthodox test that can give you a clue. People who have a naturally high level of noradrenaline and adrenaline tend to avoid caffeine, not because of an aversion to bitterness, but because they don’t like how they feel when they consume caffeine. People who are naturally low in noradrenaline and adrenaline tend to consume a regular quantity of caffeine that is higher than the average person.
Caffeine if frequently found in: Tea, coffee, energy drinks / patches, some soft drinks.
Chocolate can also cause a negative response in some people as it is a related but different molecule.
An indicator that your caffeine use is higher than average is regular (almost daily or daily) consumption of 120 mg or greater.
Medications to discuss with your doctor:
- Caffeine avoidant (likely high noradrenaline):
- Guanfacine.
- Clonidine.
- Beta Blocker (Eg Propranolol).
- Caution:
- The above three medications need you to have average or higher blood pressure. May not be suitable for people with low blood pressure.
- Caffeine daily (likely low noradrenaline):
- Desvenlafaxine,
- Sertraline.
Mental Health Therapy
Toxic and Abusive People
Recognising Toxic / Abusive People
We have an extensive section on Toxic & Abusive People, from spotting them, managing / avoiding them, and escaping them.
When we do connect, we can mistake ourselves for the mask we used to fit in. This can feel empty, dishonest and false. We can lose ourselves in thinking that we are only worthy because we produce things, or do services, rather than recognise that all people have inherent worth.
These are all roles, and are not you.
Abusive people love to take advantage of this sensitivity and extra goods from the neurodivergent person.
Learning how to identify toxic people is very important. The odds are that if you have a high Rejection Sensitivity response and it is frequently triggered by certain people, then you are likely:
SBA: Surrounded By Arseholes – a ‘diagnosis‘ I sometimes give my anxious people when they respond appropriately anxious around hostile people.
Joshua Davidson.
The Traffic Light System I developed helps you to identify a system for who is and who isn’t a concern.
- Flags:
- Green flag behaviours are what we would like to see. They are consistent, predictible and helpful.
- Amber flag behaviours are when we aren’t sure if they are good or bad… yet. But we should become more alert to their future actions.
- Red flag behaviour is concerning. If mild, a few red flags should alert you to a potential abusive person. If strong, you don’t need a few flags to tell you.
- Trust Zones:
- Green trust zone is for people who are 98% + green flags. You can relax around these people.
- Amber trust zone is for new people, or people who are doing some odd behaviours on a background of being in the green zone.
- Red trust zone is for people who have shown they are untrustworthy.
- Toxic People Mind Toolset:
- Adjusting your expectations of an individual based on their behaviours and response to reasonable engagement about those problems.
- 3 Pillars:
- Green Pillar, where people learn from their misakes.
- Amber Pillar, where someone is not too harmful, but there are a few concerning actions that need attention.
- Red Pillar, where someone is making more harmful ‘mistakes’ than is reasonable, without improvement, or they do an action that is quite harmful (you only need one).
We also have a section on Testing for Toxic.
Once you’ve started to learn about how to spot the toxic / abusive people, and that their behaviour isn’t your fault or responsibility, you can start to yeet the toxic people (remove them from your social space).
Then, with a bit of retraining, your Rejection Sensitivity can calm down (if no other driver).
There is a strong caveat here. Even after internalising the above, you can still struggle with Rejection Sensitivity. Two main causes for that is:
- Past trauma:
- Trauma counselling,
- It is rare that your Rejection Sensitivity is due to trauma, but common that your social trauma can exacerbate Rejection Sensitivity.
- Biological:
- Addressed above.
Managing Self Worth
We have a section on Anxiety and Self Worth.
The central error in this is mistaking your worth as your product – gifts, services and sacrifice.
Your worth is in you as a person, not what you do for others. You are a Human Being, not a Human Doing.
This reorientation of worth allows the Human to make mistakes without being a mistake, and from those mistakes, learn, grow and change.
This allows you to produce a reasonable amount, instead of a superhuman amount. After all, the person in the team who does the least is still getting paid just as much as you are.
This makes it easier to spot those who are abusing your generosity and cutting them off. This allows you to walk away from that toxic situation.
When a neurodivergent person begins to arc up with extra sensitivity from any of the above trigger situations, they can query themselves – am I experiencing Rejection Sensitivity? Then take a pause and separate the feeling of personal failure from the situation. You haven’t changed – the situation has.
Sometimes the neurodivergent person has made a mistake, and if so, it will be clear and obvious. We don’t lose friendships over subtle problems, and a person who claims we made a subtle or illogical and non-evidenced error is someone to be aware of – they are likely toxic and may also be abusive (take the opportunity to get out of that relationship). Once we have identified the error, what can we learn from it? Can we adapt and adjust our actions, plans etc to factor in this new information? How can we grow?
We have turned a mistake into a growth opportunity.
Managing Humble Theory
See our page on Beating Social Anxiety – Humble Theory.
Mostly social anxiety disorder is a side effect of a biological condition, mostly frequently errors in the Amygdala, secondarily various forms of exhaustion. While circumstances can contribute and exacerbate social anxiety, it is rare for a social anxiety disorder to be caused by trauma.
The biological condition should be diagnosed and treated to manage the underlying cause of the anxiety.
What is left is the Social Anxiety Mindset – the cognitive errors primarily caused by the condition. The fear of judgement and the Rejection Sensitivity.
The Social Anxiety mindset can be distilled down to “People’s opinions will focus on the mistakes I make, and that is going to cause problems.”
This leads us to two erroneous solutions:
1. To avoid judgement, you must be perfect all of the time.
2. If you can’t be perfect, don’t be seen.
These lead to a host of unhelpful behaviours.
*Humble Theory* focuses on the basis for the fear or people –
1. The fear of being judged for making mistakes, and thereby hurt or controlled, and
2. The inability to tell who is trying to be helpful versus who is being harmful (toxic).
Embracing being Humble assumes that we will make mistakes at times, and that growing is a good thing.
Embracing being Humble enables us to welcome being corrected and give opportunity for others to be a part of our growth.
Humble Theory also helps toxic people (who want to use false claims of mistakes, or who want to use our errors to manipulate & control us) to stand out from those who are genuinely being helpful. Humble Theory helps to identify who needs Toxic Person Management. Knowing how to spot abusive people reduces the fear of being hurt by everyone.

Objectivity: Reasonable Boundaries aka saying “no”
While there are no ‘lazy people’, there is productive laziness. There is no point in me doing the task you have just done, nor is there a point in me doing the task that you are expected to do – that is just a waste of resources.
There are many people who will use this kind of productive laziness to shift tasks to someone else, merely by stating or implying that it is expected of them. Wanting to belong and social conformity will push us to take on tasks that we don’t really need to do, and shouldn’t be expected to do in a cooperative social group. Sometimes this is them being fair in trying to compensate for their health, sometimes it is abusive.
There are times when we should say “yes”, “maybe”, “no” and “f@#$ off”.
Our challenge is to work out which time is which. As covered above, it is not uncommon for us to be involved with abusive people, who benefit from conning us for their gain and our own detriment. They will hijack our normal cooperative nature to abuse us, obfuscating when it is fair to say “yes” and “no”. We cover this in quite some detail in various sections of Conflict. Covering, even in summary, the massive amount of content there is beyond the scope of this article.
The very bare bones of this part of therapy is to learn what reasonable people have as reasonable boundaries, so that you can make reasonable decisions about your choices. Your choices need to be part of fair and reasonable Consent.
Once you are confident that you have a good grasp on what is objectively reasonable, we can easily detect when someone is contrary to that, alerting us to a potential abusive person, and we can assert our fair rights to not be taken advantage of.
Assert means to be bold, clear and or confident in your statements and behavior, and then standing to that definition unless you have a good reason not to (like new information, the situation changes etc). Effectively, the opposite to what politicians do 😉
Responsibility: Adjusting back to ‘fair’
Imagine two groups. Try not to get too political about the descriptions – try to imagine how they work to gain the message.
Group A is self interested. The strong get what they want, the weak comply or pay. Whoever is the strongest in this group gets what they want and need by exploiting those who cannot stand up to them. Not too bad if you are the strongest, pretty awful if you aren’t. Eventually, this group will fall apart and everyone loses, as the weakest members fail to keep their own health, which means they can no longer be exploited, so now the next weakest fail. This rot makes its way up to the top, and the group is done.
Group B is cooperative. Everyone gets what they want and need, by sharing the resources. Either everyone eats, or no one eats. Sometimes that means that everyone goes less than they want, but no one is worse off than anyone else. Everyone is seen as having the same intrinsic worth – equality, even though each person has their own unique qualities – individualism. If someone has a particular need that is unique to them or their subgroup, that need is met by the whole group – this is about equity, rather than blind equality.
Abusive people seek to change any group they are in to be like Group A. Their inherent self interest and indifference to the suffering of others leads to the exploitation of those who can’t stop them, as they make their way to top in their belief of hierarchy. They may mouth that they care, but their actions do not match their words.
“Words are cheap. Actions are where it is at.
Through their actions, the true worth of a person is in the actions they take to improve the situation.”
Joshua Davidson
Good people prefer to be in Group B. While we all like to feel special, do we want to be special at the costs of someone else, or do we want a uniqueness in specialty? For example, I would like to be recognised for the skill and ability that I have put hard work into developing – when I do, that positive recognition helps reward the effort I put into acquiring that skill and ability. It helps me feel good – special. Not better than you as a person to person comparison, just that I have this skill / ability, and perhaps you don’t, or not as much. You will have some skill / ability that I don’t, and I will give positive recognition of that. All skills and abilities are available to the group, and that is a good thing. I’m not more special or important than you – I have a special skill, and you have a different special skill.
In Group B, if I make a mistake, I will happily own that error and do what I can to fix it (see Humble Theory above, or click the link to get the full version). Often, others in the group will help me, because in doing so, the group benefits, which also means the people who helped me benefit. This benevolent self interest is quite different to the selfish self interest of the abusive people. The rising tide carries all boats, and I am one of the boats.
“Benevolent Self Interest helps all people, not just the self. It won’t tax one person to benefit all, rather all people contribute for everyone’s benefit.
Malicious Self Interest helps only the individual at the cost of everyone.”
Joshua Davidson
In a cooperative group, such as Group B, it is fairly clear who is responsible for tasks, fixing problems and so on. We all know the tasks that need to be done, and we do it as we see the need to do so. Some things we will assign to certain people to avoid overlapping both of us doing it redundantly. If I make an error, I’ll fix it, maybe with some help.
Abusive people are the heroes or the victims in their story. They aren’t the ones who created the problem, and they aren’t the ones who honestly did the tasks, although they want to take credit for it, and they aren’t the ones who made mistakes. See Narcissism and NPD to learn more about this malicious self interest.
Abusive people will hijack your sense of responsibility and tweak it so that you will be responsible for their feelings, their thoughts, and their actions.
They will try to con you into believing that you are responsible for them, ironically wanting you to treat them as a better than average person, while you are responsible for them as if they were a child.
In my Quick 6 Relationship Tips, the last item is key here.
- Tell them that you love them in several different ways – be open to their expressions of love.
- Honesty: clear, transparent and timely communication – it isn’t surveillance, you have the right to privacy.
- Hearing them, not assuming them – using the Principle of Charity, not the Assumption of Malice.
- Adult expectations – if they are adults, don’t infantilise them.
- What is good for the goose, is good for the ganda – no double standards (separate rules) without a medical condition need (eg gambling).
- Own your sh!t – don’t own theirs.
* Be kind
When you have a more objective, cooperative view of the limits of your responsibility, it is easier to tell when your learning algorithm is becoming erroneous, or an abusive person is hijacking it, trying to falsely claim that you are more responsible for them than you should be (caveat for medical conditions). While each specific situation is a specific case, there are many generalisable elements to human interactions that allow us to be reasonably accurate in estimating where “right” and “wrong” are.
Ending Thought & Mood Loops
As stated many times in this page, we want to learn from our actual past experiences, or anticipated future experiences, so that we can do better. This can only happen by reviewing what we have done, or imagining what we are going to do, then trying out some imagined variations to the scenario, kind of like a choose your own adventure book.
Choose your own adventure:
You are going to visit your parents. Your mother says she has missed you and wishes you would visit daily like her friend’s children visit them.
- If you say “Stop nagging me mother!” turn to page 67.
- If you say “I’m sorry mother, I’ll visit you every day 🙁 “, turn to page 666.
- If you say “I have some doubts that your friends children travel 90 minutes every day to visit them without a medical reason to do so”, turn to page 42.
Looping Thoughts
We can become stuck in a loop of “what if this happened, then what would I do?” Thinking about how we learn (as discuyssed above), what are you actually doing in this loop?
You are hunting for a way for a way to get to a good scenario. Your imagination is trying this scenario over and over again, trying to figure out how to achieve that. A Loop tells you that your mind isn’t satisfied with the current solutions and is looking for something better.
If you have enough cognitive capacity, we can investigate that loop and try to refocus it to something useful, or we need to acknowledge that we don’t have the capacity to do so and end it. If you don’t have the capacity, skip straight to the Mood Loop below.
Assuming that you have the cognitive capacity to use the thought loop prior to ending it, we want to figure out what the Thought Loop style is, then challenge it, focus it to usefulness if possible, then end it.
Challenging the Thought Loop:
- Understanding your Thought Loop Style.
- Challenge the loop’s usefulness:
- Refocus your thoughts to be useful,
- Consolidate a viable future plan.
- End the Thought Loop:
- Ensure you haven’t forgot to check and enact the Top 6 “I’m feeling weird” Causes.
- Distract yourself with something else.
Rejection Sensitivity is focused primarily about navigating people, who are either unrealistically antagonistic, actually abusive, or unrealistically helpful / awestruck.
Understanding your Thought Loop Style:
- Unrealistically antagonistic people:
- Abusive people:
- The person / people who are unreasonable in your imagination, but are realistic to the people in real life (especially if others agree with you).
- The odds are the person / people are abusive (Testing for Toxic).
- Abusive people turn all situations toxic to keep you defensive and compliant (Understanding Abusive People).
- The person / people who are unreasonable in your imagination, but are realistic to the people in real life (especially if others agree with you).
- Not abusive people:
- The person / people are exaggerated in how unhelpful they are in your imagination, but in real life they have a strong history of being fair.
- While it is worth making your imagined interactions a bit worse than they would likely be, there isn’t much value in making them much worse than they really are.
- You aren’t fighting evil here. People may be reluctant to listen and help, but there are limits.
- There is no point rehearsing against a non-win situation.
- There is no point rehearsing against a situation that won’t exist.
- The person / people are exaggerated in how unhelpful they are in your imagination, but in real life they have a strong history of being fair.
- Abusive people:
- Unrealistically helpful or awestruck:
- Over Helpful:
- Much like there being little point rehearsing scenarios where people are too unhelpful, there is little use in rehearsing scenarios where everything works perfectly either.
- Over Awestruck:
- It can be nice to be recognised and validated when we do well. However, most people won’t spend much time in that recognition or validation of you.
- If someone is doing a lot of validating, you may want to wonder why.
- Do they do this for everyone, or just you?
- Why are they doing this?
- If someone is doing a lot of validating, you may want to wonder why.
- Most people are not awestruck by a reasonable conversation looking for a reasonable outcome. As such, this imagination scenario has become unhelpful.
- To achieve that level of awestruck often means you have mysteriously developed a skill or ability that you don’t have access to, which you would find impressive.
- Should you suddenly have that ability, others may not be as enthused as you would be.
- The best use of this imagination is to recognise a skill you may work on, if you think that skill is going to be useful often.
- To achieve that level of awestruck often means you have mysteriously developed a skill or ability that you don’t have access to, which you would find impressive.
- It can be nice to be recognised and validated when we do well. However, most people won’t spend much time in that recognition or validation of you.
- Over Helpful:
- Unrealistic Scenario:
- An unrealistic scenario is unlikely to happen or the expectation of consequence is unlikely / distorted.
- Risk management focuses on two axis of consideration to rate if there is mild risk, moderate risk or high risk. We can use this idea to work out if the scenario is realistic and if so, how much effort to put into planning.
- The Axese:
- Likelihood of occurrence, how likely the concern is to actually, realistically, occur.
- Consequence of occurrence, how bad the outcome actually is:
- Responsibility:
- Is it actually your actions that positively lead to the occurence?
- If they do, do you have to fix it if it happens?
- Cost:
- To fix it, what would it take?
- Responsibility:
- Low risk:
- Likelihood = low, consequence = low:
- Not worth focusing on unless you are entertained by the exercise.
- If this isn’t entertaining, break the loop.
- Likelihood = low, consequence = low:
- Moderate risk:
- Likelihood = mild-moderate, consequence = mild-moderate,
- Worth some basic planning, try to be realistic about the likely outcome.
- Likelihood = mild-moderate, consequence = mild-moderate,
- High risk:
- Likelihood = moderate to high, consequence = moderate to high,
- Worth more complex planning and preparation.
- Likelihood = moderate to high, consequence = moderate to high,
- The Axese:
- Risk management focuses on two axis of consideration to rate if there is mild risk, moderate risk or high risk. We can use this idea to work out if the scenario is realistic and if so, how much effort to put into planning.
- If the scenario is:
- Realistic:
- Make a plan to address the reasonable risk
- Write down your expectations and the 3 levels to address them, or if needed, the contingencies to reasonably predictable complications.
- Writing it down externalises it and forces you to be more linear.
- Mild risk aka unlikely, or inconsequential:
- Looping on it is more about dysregulation than the problem.
- Check the Top 6 “I’m feeling weird” Causes..
- Moderate risk:
- Ask someone for help.
- Looping may be trying to find a better answer.
- Solve for “worst reasonable case”, “best reasonable case” and “most likely case”:
- All other variants can be adapted from those 3.
- Also remember, you can make up a solution on the fly. It isn’t possible to solve for every possibility, no matter how much we wish it were possible. At some point you would have to make up an answer at the time when something unexpected happens – so you might as well delegate all unlikely / unpredictable situations to that solution to start with.
- Ask someone for help.
- High risk:
- Check your facts that led you to this conclusion.
- Create the 3 solves from Moderate.
- Solve contingencies for a few likely complications.
- Enlist some others in this evidence based high risk situation.
- Otherwise the scenario isn’t real, and doesn’t need a solution – move on to breaking the loop.
- See Solving Problems for more.
- Make a plan to address the reasonable risk
- Realistic:
- An unrealistic scenario is unlikely to happen or the expectation of consequence is unlikely / distorted.
Once you know what kind of loop you have, you may be able to redirect it to become useful again by challenging it.
Each of the above Thought Loop styles has a particular method to challenge it.
Refocusing the Unhelpful Thought Loop to Useful Exploration:
- Person is unrealistically antagonistic:
- “Hey brain, I appreciate the offer to practice on hard mode, but that’s not helping me get through this. I know that person, they aren’t hard mode material. Instead, let us be more realistic about how they are going to respond?”
- List what they are likely to do, then consider scenarios where that happens.
- Person is realistically antagonistic:
- “Hey brain, rather than trying to hyperfocus on this one thing that I know I can’t win because they’ll cheat, let us focus on how to get out of this toxic relationship?”
- See Escaping Abuse.
- Person is unrealistically helpful:
- “That’s a nice fantasy brain, but let us consider what they would really do instead?”
- List what they are likely to do, then consider scenarios where that happens.
- “That’s a nice fantasy brain, but let us consider what they would really do instead?”
- Person is unrealistically awestruck:
- “Nice fantasy brain, but I don’t have that skill or ability. Let’s practice what is more useful?”
- Either:
- List what skills you do have, then consider scenarios where that happens.
- Recognise you haven’t got the skill / ability to solve this problem and accept that you are human.
If you can’t focus the loop into realistic territory (for those that are worth exploring), then it is important to break out of the loop.
Breaking the Thought Loop:
- “Brain, none of that is helping, and I don’t want to waste time on things that won’t help.”
- Go through the Top 6 “I’m Feeling Weird” Causes.
- Do something interesting and distracting:
- TV,
- Talk to someone,
- Phone / computer game,
- Crossword puzzle etc.
Looping Mood
Looping Mood is very related to Looping Thoughts, except that your cognition is lower (usually lower dopamine) and so you are running on adrenaline (fight / flight), so the solution is far less intellectual.
Without cognition (ability to think), shifting the the loop to be informative is not an option.
Instead we need to work out why we are looping.
We are looping our mood is because we are compromised – that is, this is the effect of something throwing our mind and body out of its regular function. Most of this is discussed in the Top 6 “I’m feeling weird” Causes.
Causes for Compromised, The Top 6 “I’m feeling weird” Causes.
- 1. Meds:
- Need to take Meds, or
- You’ve taken something you shouldn’t have.
- 2. Food:
- You haven’t eaten for 4+ hours (eat), or
- You’ve eaten an allergen (allergy safety plan).
- 3. Hormones:
- Adrenaline has spiked or crashed
- PMDD / Menstrual
- Cortisol is stuck high
- Thyroid is acting up.
- 4. Fatigue:
- You need to rest.
- 5. Sensory:
- Pain: (pain safety plan),
- Allergies: eg hayfever,
- Overwhelmed, (decrease by going to quieter, darker or less tactile location)
- Underwhelmed, opposite of above.
- 6. Threat:
- An actual clear and present danger (deal with the danger).
If this plus a bit of time doesn’t stop the mood loop, call for help as per your Safety Plan.
References
Early interpersonal trauma and later adjustment: The mediational role of rejection sensitivity, Downey, Khouri & Feldman, 1997, APA PsycNet. (n.d.). Psycnet.apa.org. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-36663-003
Emotional Regulation and Rejection Sensitivity, Dr William W. Dodson, 2017, https://chadd.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/ATTN_10_16_EmotionalRegulation.pdf
New Insights Into Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria. Dodson, W. (2020, July 29). ADDitude. https://www.additudemag.com/rejection-sensitive-dysphoria-adhd-emotional-dysregulation/